SALAMANCA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

198

49%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

199

49%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

89

49%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

89

47%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

109

49%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

110

51%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

30
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

92

52%

LEVEL 2

54

31%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

84

56%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

95

46%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

95

44%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

157

44%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

149

43%

LEVEL 2

110

32%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

50

85%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

59

41%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

170

56%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

140

53%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

35

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.