Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

143

28%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

97

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

156

28%

LEVEL 2

214

38%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

64

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

132

28%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

138

27%

LEVEL 2

203

39%

LEVEL 3

122

23%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

99

22%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

96

20%

LEVEL 2

207

42%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

44

75%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

60

85%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

96

41%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.