VOORHEESVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

103

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

135

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

88

43%

LEVEL 4

57

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

66

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

43

24%

LEVEL 3

65

37%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

69

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

139

41%

LEVEL 4

92

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

117

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

149

43%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

133

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

21

60%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

146

42%

LEVEL 4

102

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

233
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

61

19%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

133

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.