ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

187

37%

LEVEL 2

184

37%

LEVEL 3

98

20%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

170

35%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

66

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

82

33%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

92

38%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

174

36%

LEVEL 2

181

38%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

161

35%

LEVEL 2

152

33%

LEVEL 3

81

18%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

117

28%

LEVEL 2

171

41%

LEVEL 3

97

23%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

99

25%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

70

83%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

71

86%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

145

44%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.