HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE PROMISE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

109

21%

LEVEL 2

168

32%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

167

31%

LEVEL 4

136

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

76

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

217
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

73

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

255
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

153

33%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

109

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

19

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

127

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

45

39%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

42

41%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

246
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

165

32%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

302
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

167

31%

LEVEL 4

135

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

92

21%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

109

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.