Skip to Content
Main content

URBAN CHOICE CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

79

35%

LEVEL 2

109

49%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

32

31%

LEVEL 2

54

52%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

54

49%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

47

39%

LEVEL 2

55

46%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

64

49%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

8

67%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

71

47%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

99

57%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

14

30%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

18

39%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

62

31%

LEVEL 2

104

52%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

17

71%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

20

49%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

67

37%

LEVEL 2

89

49%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

109

51%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.