KIPP AMP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

53

31%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

112
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

80

25%

LEVEL 2

125

39%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

98
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

110

39%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

38

54%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

27

40%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

132
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

81

24%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

127

38%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

119

37%

LEVEL 3

90

28%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

83

27%

LEVEL 2

115

38%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.