Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX ACADEMY OF PROMISE CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

74

20%

LEVEL 2

157

42%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

179

46%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

91

47%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

96

48%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

40

22%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

83

44%

LEVEL 3

68

36%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

84
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

72

40%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

84

43%

LEVEL 3

46

24%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

104

52%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

56

18%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

94

30%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

150

45%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

18

31%

LEVEL 2

31

53%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

17

29%

LEVEL 2

29

50%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

130
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

55

18%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

148

45%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

30

52%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

31

50%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

68

49%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

52

21%

LEVEL 2

115

45%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

111

44%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.