Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-HARLEM 2 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

53

13%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

195

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

41

10%

LEVEL 3

125

29%

LEVEL 4

261

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

100

50%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

206
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

146

65%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

24

13%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

95

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

180
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

21

10%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

115

57%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

5

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

252
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

150

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

285
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

35

11%

LEVEL 3

92

29%

LEVEL 4

193

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

33

41%

LEVEL 4

37

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

56

60%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

308
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

36

10%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

185

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

7%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

240

66%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

45
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

21

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

330
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

52

13%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

193

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

43

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

52

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

43

14%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

152

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

303
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

32

9%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

209

62%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.