MONROE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,204
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,146

LEVEL 1

11,463

36%

LEVEL 2

8,479

26%

LEVEL 3

6,508

20%

LEVEL 4

5,696

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,871
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,150

LEVEL 1

11,701

35%

LEVEL 2

8,578

26%

LEVEL 3

7,239

22%

LEVEL 4

5,632

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,979
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,647

LEVEL 1

5,400

35%

LEVEL 2

4,268

27%

LEVEL 3

3,274

21%

LEVEL 4

2,705

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,278
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,974

LEVEL 1

5,448

34%

LEVEL 2

4,248

27%

LEVEL 3

3,601

23%

LEVEL 4

2,677

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,225
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,499

LEVEL 1

6,063

37%

LEVEL 2

4,211

26%

LEVEL 3

3,234

20%

LEVEL 4

2,991

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,593
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,176

LEVEL 1

6,253

36%

LEVEL 2

4,330

25%

LEVEL 3

3,638

21%

LEVEL 4

2,955

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

487
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 958

LEVEL 1

209

22%

LEVEL 2

262

27%

LEVEL 3

257

27%

LEVEL 4

230

24%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

534
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,067

LEVEL 1

215

20%

LEVEL 2

318

30%

LEVEL 3

296

28%

LEVEL 4

238

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

19

34%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

15
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

820
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,551

LEVEL 1

368

24%

LEVEL 2

363

23%

LEVEL 3

339

22%

LEVEL 4

481

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

803
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,541

LEVEL 1

385

25%

LEVEL 2

353

23%

LEVEL 3

351

23%

LEVEL 4

452

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,889
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,837

LEVEL 1

2,519

16%

LEVEL 2

4,429

28%

LEVEL 3

4,571

29%

LEVEL 4

4,318

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,288
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,374

LEVEL 1

2,617

16%

LEVEL 2

4,469

27%

LEVEL 3

5,059

31%

LEVEL 4

4,229

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,152
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,831

LEVEL 1

5,526

63%

LEVEL 2

2,153

24%

LEVEL 3

800

9%

LEVEL 4

352

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,305
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,031

LEVEL 1

5,565

62%

LEVEL 2

2,161

24%

LEVEL 3

887

10%

LEVEL 4

418

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

844
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,913

LEVEL 1

2,816

57%

LEVEL 2

1,253

26%

LEVEL 3

533

11%

LEVEL 4

311

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

926
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,087

LEVEL 1

2,891

57%

LEVEL 2

1,270

25%

LEVEL 3

634

12%

LEVEL 4

292

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,934
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28,071

LEVEL 1

8,317

30%

LEVEL 2

7,820

28%

LEVEL 3

6,318

23%

LEVEL 4

5,616

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,550
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 28,819

LEVEL 1

8,346

29%

LEVEL 2

7,923

27%

LEVEL 3

6,995

24%

LEVEL 4

5,555

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

270
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,075

LEVEL 1

3,146

77%

LEVEL 2

659

16%

LEVEL 3

190

5%

LEVEL 4

80

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

321
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,331

LEVEL 1

3,355

77%

LEVEL 2

655

15%

LEVEL 3

244

6%

LEVEL 4

77

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12,092
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 29,989

LEVEL 1

9,771

33%

LEVEL 2

8,126

27%

LEVEL 3

6,436

21%

LEVEL 4

5,656

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

12,718
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,803

LEVEL 1

9,913

32%

LEVEL 2

8,172

27%

LEVEL 3

7,123

23%

LEVEL 4

5,595

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

112
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,157

LEVEL 1

1,692

78%

LEVEL 2

353

16%

LEVEL 3

72

3%

LEVEL 4

40

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,347

LEVEL 1

1,788

76%

LEVEL 2

406

17%

LEVEL 3

116

5%

LEVEL 4

37

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,191
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,290

LEVEL 1

2,083

14%

LEVEL 2

4,016

26%

LEVEL 3

4,559

30%

LEVEL 4

4,632

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,587
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,247

LEVEL 1

2,424

15%

LEVEL 2

4,236

26%

LEVEL 3

5,045

31%

LEVEL 4

4,542

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,013
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,856

LEVEL 1

9,380

56%

LEVEL 2

4,463

26%

LEVEL 3

1,949

12%

LEVEL 4

1,064

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,284
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,903

LEVEL 1

9,277

55%

LEVEL 2

4,342

26%

LEVEL 3

2,194

13%

LEVEL 4

1,090

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

12,201
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,133

LEVEL 1

11,458

36%

LEVEL 2

8,474

26%

LEVEL 3

6,506

20%

LEVEL 4

5,695

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

12,869
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,135

LEVEL 1

11,689

35%

LEVEL 2

8,577

26%

LEVEL 3

7,237

22%

LEVEL 4

5,632

17%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.