SCHUYLER COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

258

37%

LEVEL 2

262

37%

LEVEL 3

123

18%

LEVEL 4

58

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

264

38%

LEVEL 2

236

34%

LEVEL 3

123

18%

LEVEL 4

71

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

122

36%

LEVEL 2

137

41%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

136

37%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

73

20%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

237

37%

LEVEL 2

247

38%

LEVEL 3

107

17%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

173
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

241

38%

LEVEL 2

218

34%

LEVEL 3

111

18%

LEVEL 4

62

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

160

28%

LEVEL 2

241

41%

LEVEL 3

122

21%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

170

29%

LEVEL 2

222

38%

LEVEL 3

118

20%

LEVEL 4

71

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

98

82%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

94

83%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

179

46%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

177

48%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.