EDGEMONT JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

114

40%

LEVEL 4

101

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

117

41%

LEVEL 4

102

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

25

17%

LEVEL 3

65

44%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

49

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

53

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

61

41%

LEVEL 4

53

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

89
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

57

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

94
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

56

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

66

45%

LEVEL 4

38

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

64

44%

LEVEL 4

35

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

111

43%

LEVEL 4

99

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

111

42%

LEVEL 4

101

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.