Skip to Content
Main content

BRONXVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

323
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

50

13%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

189

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

316
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

27

7%

LEVEL 3

133

37%

LEVEL 4

183

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

26

15%

LEVEL 3

61

35%

LEVEL 4

80

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

89

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

182
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

24

11%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

109

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

13

7%

LEVEL 3

73

39%

LEVEL 4

94

50%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

11

44%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

16

62%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

19

70%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

21

84%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

254
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

105

34%

LEVEL 4

149

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

22

8%

LEVEL 3

115

40%

LEVEL 4

136

47%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

40

11%

LEVEL 3

128

36%

LEVEL 4

189

53%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

21

6%

LEVEL 3

132

38%

LEVEL 4

182

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

320
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

48

13%

LEVEL 3

134

36%

LEVEL 4

186

49%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.