OWEGO-APALACHIN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 736

LEVEL 1

183

25%

LEVEL 2

239

32%

LEVEL 3

189

26%

LEVEL 4

125

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

313
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

176

24%

LEVEL 2

253

34%

LEVEL 3

182

25%

LEVEL 4

131

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

80

23%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

98

26%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

96

25%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

298
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

165

24%

LEVEL 2

227

33%

LEVEL 3

176

26%

LEVEL 4

122

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

306
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

155

22%

LEVEL 2

240

34%

LEVEL 3

180

26%

LEVEL 4

126

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

113

18%

LEVEL 2

214

34%

LEVEL 3

175

28%

LEVEL 4

119

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

114

18%

LEVEL 2

215

34%

LEVEL 3

174

28%

LEVEL 4

127

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

70

61%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

62

55%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

55

15%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

97

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.