JOHN S HOBART ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

56

31%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

35

39%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

18

29%

LEVEL 2

21

33%

LEVEL 3

16

25%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

15

23%

LEVEL 2

28

42%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

24

44%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

10

23%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

12

27%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

37

34%

LEVEL 2

47

43%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.