Skip to Content
Main content

ALGONQUIN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

174

40%

LEVEL 3

102

23%

LEVEL 4

72

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

101

45%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

47

22%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

135

36%

LEVEL 3

120

32%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

163

40%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

122

34%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

163

43%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

36

64%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

37

66%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

58

17%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

112

33%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

157
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

141

40%

LEVEL 3

90

25%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

28

37%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

33

40%

LEVEL 2

33

40%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.