MEXICO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

138

28%

LEVEL 2

182

37%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

158

33%

LEVEL 2

154

32%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

69

29%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

81

32%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

131

28%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

106

23%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

145

32%

LEVEL 2

144

32%

LEVEL 3

103

23%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

87

21%

LEVEL 2

163

39%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

102

26%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

51

69%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

58

71%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

105

37%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

111

39%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.