Skip to Content
Main content

EAGLE HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

56

13%

LEVEL 3

150

36%

LEVEL 4

195

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

369
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

71

16%

LEVEL 3

179

40%

LEVEL 4

190

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

95

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

30

13%

LEVEL 3

88

39%

LEVEL 4

95

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

100

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

95

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

47
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

38

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

64
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

48

68%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

279
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

48

14%

LEVEL 3

131

39%

LEVEL 4

148

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

273
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

62

18%

LEVEL 3

145

42%

LEVEL 4

128

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

334
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

50

13%

LEVEL 3

139

36%

LEVEL 4

195

50%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

361
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

60

14%

LEVEL 3

175

41%

LEVEL 4

186

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

11

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

11

50%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

9

2%

LEVEL 2

48

12%

LEVEL 3

139

36%

LEVEL 4

191

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

347
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

56

14%

LEVEL 3

164

40%

LEVEL 4

183

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

11

39%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

15

37%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.