Skip to Content
Main content

PS 176 CAMBRIA HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

100

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

108

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

71

33%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

56

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

50

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

45

25%

LEVEL 4

52

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

17

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

19

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

67

19%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

79

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

174
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

84

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

99

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

71

18%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

90

23%

LEVEL 4

100

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

208
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

70

18%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

31

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

38

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

64

23%

LEVEL 4

69

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.