Skip to Content
Main content

MS 394 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

158

53%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

173

57%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

73

46%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

94

55%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

85

61%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

79

59%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

118

50%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

131

56%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

32

67%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

119

47%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

140

53%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

39

87%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

33

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

144

51%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

156

56%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

14

82%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

144

53%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

160

58%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.