Skip to Content
Main content

PS 108 PHILIP J ABINANTI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

73

29%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

20

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

15

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

17

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

30

39%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

20

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

11

37%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

22

59%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

125
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

121
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

54

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

17

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

24

51%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.