Skip to Content
Main content

PS 48 JOSEPH R DRAKE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

185

57%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

196

58%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

28

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

81

53%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

69

40%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

104

60%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

111

68%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

52

60%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

129

57%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

138

57%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

115

48%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

95

89%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

81

82%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

39
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

139

53%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

138

52%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

58

78%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

30

57%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

36

60%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

155

57%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

160

58%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

23

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.