Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 187 HUDSON CLIFFS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

80

16%

LEVEL 2

166

34%

LEVEL 3

126

26%

LEVEL 4

117

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

88

20%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

119

26%

LEVEL 4

102

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

84

34%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

10

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

32

21%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

66

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

54

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

125

42%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

111

27%

LEVEL 4

114

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

105

28%

LEVEL 4

98

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

36

43%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

15

18%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

32

41%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

143

32%

LEVEL 3

125

28%

LEVEL 4

114

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

118

28%

LEVEL 4

101

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

15

36%

LEVEL 2

23

55%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

90

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

87

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

62

23%

LEVEL 2

125

46%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

83

39%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.