PS 1 ALFRED E SMITH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

71

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

28

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

21

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

21

20%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

43

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

32

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

102
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

36

28%

LEVEL 4

66

51%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

49

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

14

45%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

65

45%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

51

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

19

66%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

96
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

63

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

78
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

47

39%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

27

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

22

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

29

23%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

44

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

31

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.