MALONE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

139

39%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

148

39%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

64

37%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

81

42%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

136

40%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

111

34%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

75

23%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

22

79%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

102

50%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

100

55%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

134

39%

LEVEL 2

104

30%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

107
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

144

39%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.