SALMON RIVER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

234

46%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

72

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

275

52%

LEVEL 2

165

31%

LEVEL 3

67

13%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

102

44%

LEVEL 2

78

34%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

132

48%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

31

11%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

161

55%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

59
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

151

47%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

175

53%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

31
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

78

44%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

93

51%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

172

39%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

202

44%

LEVEL 2

161

35%

LEVEL 3

66

15%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

64

90%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

73

94%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

30

29%

LEVEL 2

47

45%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

50

44%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

204

51%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

225

54%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

47

11%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

95
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

221

45%

LEVEL 2

175

36%

LEVEL 3

71

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

91
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

266

51%

LEVEL 2

162

31%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.