Skip to Content
Main content

CITY HONORS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

33

8%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

198

50%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

59

15%

LEVEL 3

142

36%

LEVEL 4

176

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

177
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

96

49%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

83

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

102

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

93

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

20

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

217
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

135

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

104

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

28

42%

LEVEL 4

20

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

24

41%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

14

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

21

62%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

29

8%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

191

54%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

132

36%

LEVEL 4

175

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

155

55%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

136

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

43

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

40

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.