CASEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

131

37%

LEVEL 4

114

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

81

22%

LEVEL 3

149

40%

LEVEL 4

118

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

84

44%

LEVEL 4

51

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

67

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

18

29%

LEVEL 4

35

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

53
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

29

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

100

40%

LEVEL 4

72

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

60

23%

LEVEL 3

106

41%

LEVEL 4

80

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

130

38%

LEVEL 4

114

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

77

21%

LEVEL 3

147

41%

LEVEL 4

118

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

123

39%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

68

21%

LEVEL 3

139

42%

LEVEL 4

106

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

10

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.