Skip to Content
Main content

THOMAS JEFFERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

266

60%

LEVEL 2

109

25%

LEVEL 3

50

11%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

243

61%

LEVEL 2

96

24%

LEVEL 3

42

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

128

59%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

97

52%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

138

61%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

146

69%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

134

53%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

113

49%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

96

73%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

99

82%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

213

55%

LEVEL 2

106

27%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

53

93%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

205

54%

LEVEL 2

106

28%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

61

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

40

35%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

226

69%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

203

71%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.