Skip to Content
Main content

FALCONER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

96

29%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

30

75%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

64

42%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

73

39%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.