HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMY EAST CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

76

24%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

88

25%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

58

32%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

74

47%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

54

31%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

73

40%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

59

29%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

54

43%

LEVEL 3

27

22%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

109

43%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

123

42%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.