BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

180

41%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

185

47%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

89

37%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

94

49%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

29

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

55

13%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

175

48%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

158

39%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

149

43%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

36

75%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.