Skip to Content
Main content

GORDON PARKS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

124

28%

LEVEL 2

186

42%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

132

29%

LEVEL 2

191

43%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

99

42%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

109

46%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

82

39%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

126
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

121

28%

LEVEL 2

180

42%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

125

29%

LEVEL 2

185

43%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

84

22%

LEVEL 2

174

46%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

44

56%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

48

70%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

75

43%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

76

29%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

68

30%

LEVEL 2

99

44%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.