KIPP INFINITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

219

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

379
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

49

9%

LEVEL 2

120

22%

LEVEL 3

199

36%

LEVEL 4

180

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

112

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

201
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

104

37%

LEVEL 4

97

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

107

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

95

36%

LEVEL 4

83

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

95
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

285
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

169

45%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

279
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

139

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

64

15%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

201

48%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

70

17%

LEVEL 3

160

39%

LEVEL 4

166

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

53
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

366
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

89

18%

LEVEL 3

152

31%

LEVEL 4

214

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

357
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

46

9%

LEVEL 2

105

21%

LEVEL 3

183

36%

LEVEL 4

174

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

14

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

13

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

364
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

99

20%

LEVEL 3

159

31%

LEVEL 4

205

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

350
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

115

23%

LEVEL 3

183

36%

LEVEL 4

167

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.