Skip to Content
Main content

ACADEMY OF PUBLIC RELATIONS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

172

67%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

145

68%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

76

69%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

61

65%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

96

65%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

84

71%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

123

65%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

112

67%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

116

60%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

101

60%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

56

86%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

44

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

130

65%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

99

66%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

42

75%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

46

75%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

24

55%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

148

69%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

120

71%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.