Skip to Content
Main content

GASKILL PREPARATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

236

62%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

27

7%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

244

63%

LEVEL 2

112

29%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

116

64%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

114

63%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

120

61%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

130

63%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

64

51%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

131

70%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

136

70%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

19

63%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

184

58%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

26

8%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

181

57%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

52

87%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

63

84%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

41

50%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

195

66%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

214

67%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.