JEFFERSON COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,398
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,492

LEVEL 1

1,795

28%

LEVEL 2

2,299

35%

LEVEL 3

1,558

24%

LEVEL 4

840

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,926
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,753

LEVEL 1

1,833

27%

LEVEL 2

1,994

30%

LEVEL 3

1,876

28%

LEVEL 4

1,050

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,200
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,207

LEVEL 1

844

26%

LEVEL 2

1,163

36%

LEVEL 3

787

25%

LEVEL 4

413

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,450
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,319

LEVEL 1

855

26%

LEVEL 2

1,014

31%

LEVEL 3

935

28%

LEVEL 4

515

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,198
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,285

LEVEL 1

951

29%

LEVEL 2

1,136

35%

LEVEL 3

771

23%

LEVEL 4

427

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,476
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,434

LEVEL 1

978

28%

LEVEL 2

980

29%

LEVEL 3

941

27%

LEVEL 4

535

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

121
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

155
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

25

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,937
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,116

LEVEL 1

1,388

27%

LEVEL 2

1,791

35%

LEVEL 3

1,232

24%

LEVEL 4

705

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,375
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,326

LEVEL 1

1,415

27%

LEVEL 2

1,536

29%

LEVEL 3

1,504

28%

LEVEL 4

871

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

136

36%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

128
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

175
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

149

29%

LEVEL 2

198

38%

LEVEL 3

126

24%

LEVEL 4

49

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

200
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

161

29%

LEVEL 2

199

36%

LEVEL 3

135

24%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,319
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,421

LEVEL 1

1,057

19%

LEVEL 2

2,045

38%

LEVEL 3

1,494

28%

LEVEL 4

825

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,817
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,652

LEVEL 1

1,091

19%

LEVEL 2

1,744

31%

LEVEL 3

1,797

32%

LEVEL 4

1,020

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

79
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,071

LEVEL 1

738

69%

LEVEL 2

254

24%

LEVEL 3

64

6%

LEVEL 4

15

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

109
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,101

LEVEL 1

742

67%

LEVEL 2

250

23%

LEVEL 3

79

7%

LEVEL 4

30

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,384
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,401

LEVEL 1

1,749

27%

LEVEL 2

2,268

35%

LEVEL 3

1,548

24%

LEVEL 4

836

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2,910
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,676

LEVEL 1

1,795

27%

LEVEL 2

1,971

30%

LEVEL 3

1,866

28%

LEVEL 4

1,044

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

46

51%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

38

49%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,465
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,006

LEVEL 1

551

18%

LEVEL 2

990

33%

LEVEL 3

905

30%

LEVEL 4

560

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,591
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,915

LEVEL 1

477

16%

LEVEL 2

847

29%

LEVEL 3

937

32%

LEVEL 4

654

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

933
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,486

LEVEL 1

1,244

36%

LEVEL 2

1,309

38%

LEVEL 3

653

19%

LEVEL 4

280

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,335
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,838

LEVEL 1

1,356

35%

LEVEL 2

1,147

30%

LEVEL 3

939

24%

LEVEL 4

396

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,394
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,474

LEVEL 1

1,788

28%

LEVEL 2

2,292

35%

LEVEL 3

1,555

24%

LEVEL 4

839

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,917
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,733

LEVEL 1

1,825

27%

LEVEL 2

1,991

30%

LEVEL 3

1,869

28%

LEVEL 4

1,048

16%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.