Skip to Content
Main content

NIAGARA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,986
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,931

LEVEL 1

2,393

30%

LEVEL 2

2,552

32%

LEVEL 3

1,884

24%

LEVEL 4

1,102

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,627
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,554

LEVEL 1

2,622

31%

LEVEL 2

2,305

27%

LEVEL 3

2,257

26%

LEVEL 4

1,370

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,440
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,833

LEVEL 1

1,128

29%

LEVEL 2

1,265

33%

LEVEL 3

894

23%

LEVEL 4

546

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,776
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,188

LEVEL 1

1,256

30%

LEVEL 2

1,156

28%

LEVEL 3

1,103

26%

LEVEL 4

673

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,546
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,098

LEVEL 1

1,265

31%

LEVEL 2

1,287

31%

LEVEL 3

990

24%

LEVEL 4

556

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,851
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,366

LEVEL 1

1,366

31%

LEVEL 2

1,149

26%

LEVEL 3

1,154

26%

LEVEL 4

697

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

148
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

226

41%

LEVEL 2

175

32%

LEVEL 3

110

20%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

196
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

288

42%

LEVEL 2

200

29%

LEVEL 3

132

19%

LEVEL 4

64

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

35
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

56

38%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

61

41%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

17

14%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

35

28%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

80
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

37

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,421
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,386

LEVEL 1

1,218

23%

LEVEL 2

1,747

32%

LEVEL 3

1,492

28%

LEVEL 4

929

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,908
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,785

LEVEL 1

1,332

23%

LEVEL 2

1,545

27%

LEVEL 3

1,783

31%

LEVEL 4

1,125

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

193
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,263

LEVEL 1

679

54%

LEVEL 2

391

31%

LEVEL 3

142

11%

LEVEL 4

51

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

247
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,291

LEVEL 1

701

54%

LEVEL 2

343

27%

LEVEL 3

168

13%

LEVEL 4

79

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

197

43%

LEVEL 2

142

31%

LEVEL 3

79

17%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

152
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

220

43%

LEVEL 2

142

28%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,896
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,714

LEVEL 1

1,556

23%

LEVEL 2

2,262

34%

LEVEL 3

1,805

27%

LEVEL 4

1,091

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,492
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,199

LEVEL 1

1,670

23%

LEVEL 2

2,037

28%

LEVEL 3

2,153

30%

LEVEL 4

1,339

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

90
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,217

LEVEL 1

837

69%

LEVEL 2

290

24%

LEVEL 3

79

6%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

135
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,355

LEVEL 1

952

70%

LEVEL 2

268

20%

LEVEL 3

104

8%

LEVEL 4

31

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,974
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,835

LEVEL 1

2,338

30%

LEVEL 2

2,523

32%

LEVEL 3

1,875

24%

LEVEL 4

1,099

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,611
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,443

LEVEL 1

2,548

30%

LEVEL 2

2,284

27%

LEVEL 3

2,246

27%

LEVEL 4

1,365

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

55

57%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

74

67%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,905
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,617

LEVEL 1

579

16%

LEVEL 2

1,133

31%

LEVEL 3

1,139

31%

LEVEL 4

766

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,217
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,794

LEVEL 1

635

17%

LEVEL 2

942

25%

LEVEL 3

1,277

34%

LEVEL 4

940

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,081
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,314

LEVEL 1

1,814

42%

LEVEL 2

1,419

33%

LEVEL 3

745

17%

LEVEL 4

336

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,410
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,760

LEVEL 1

1,987

42%

LEVEL 2

1,363

29%

LEVEL 3

980

21%

LEVEL 4

430

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,981
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,914

LEVEL 1

2,385

30%

LEVEL 2

2,548

32%

LEVEL 3

1,880

24%

LEVEL 4

1,101

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3,622
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,534

LEVEL 1

2,612

31%

LEVEL 2

2,300

27%

LEVEL 3

2,254

26%

LEVEL 4

1,368

16%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.