Skip to Content
Main content

ONEIDA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,225
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,292

LEVEL 1

3,291

35%

LEVEL 2

2,776

30%

LEVEL 3

2,029

22%

LEVEL 4

1,196

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

4,038
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,157

LEVEL 1

3,434

34%

LEVEL 2

2,685

26%

LEVEL 3

2,474

24%

LEVEL 4

1,564

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,554
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,479

LEVEL 1

1,561

35%

LEVEL 2

1,364

30%

LEVEL 3

983

22%

LEVEL 4

571

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,969
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,911

LEVEL 1

1,624

33%

LEVEL 2

1,318

27%

LEVEL 3

1,211

25%

LEVEL 4

758

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,671
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,813

LEVEL 1

1,730

36%

LEVEL 2

1,412

29%

LEVEL 3

1,046

22%

LEVEL 4

625

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

2,069
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,246

LEVEL 1

1,810

35%

LEVEL 2

1,367

26%

LEVEL 3

1,263

24%

LEVEL 4

806

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

125

40%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

123
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

134

37%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

270
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 880

LEVEL 1

352

40%

LEVEL 2

258

29%

LEVEL 3

157

18%

LEVEL 4

113

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

339
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 925

LEVEL 1

325

35%

LEVEL 2

261

28%

LEVEL 3

192

21%

LEVEL 4

147

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,552
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,028

LEVEL 1

1,616

27%

LEVEL 2

1,860

31%

LEVEL 3

1,590

26%

LEVEL 4

962

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3,126
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,616

LEVEL 1

1,697

26%

LEVEL 2

1,793

27%

LEVEL 3

1,876

28%

LEVEL 4

1,250

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

127
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,157

LEVEL 1

730

63%

LEVEL 2

300

26%

LEVEL 3

95

8%

LEVEL 4

32

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

183
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,212

LEVEL 1

758

63%

LEVEL 2

271

22%

LEVEL 3

147

12%

LEVEL 4

36

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

181
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 887

LEVEL 1

456

51%

LEVEL 2

250

28%

LEVEL 3

124

14%

LEVEL 4

57

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

264
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,030

LEVEL 1

516

50%

LEVEL 2

250

24%

LEVEL 3

176

17%

LEVEL 4

88

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,152
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,981

LEVEL 1

2,281

29%

LEVEL 2

2,548

32%

LEVEL 3

1,971

25%

LEVEL 4

1,181

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

3,928
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,720

LEVEL 1

2,332

27%

LEVEL 2

2,460

28%

LEVEL 3

2,386

27%

LEVEL 4

1,542

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

73
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,311

LEVEL 1

1,010

77%

LEVEL 2

228

17%

LEVEL 3

58

4%

LEVEL 4

15

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

110
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,437

LEVEL 1

1,102

77%

LEVEL 2

225

16%

LEVEL 3

88

6%

LEVEL 4

22

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,439

LEVEL 1

2,691

32%

LEVEL 2

2,581

31%

LEVEL 3

1,985

24%

LEVEL 4

1,182

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,937
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,188

LEVEL 1

2,787

30%

LEVEL 2

2,464

27%

LEVEL 3

2,399

26%

LEVEL 4

1,538

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 853

LEVEL 1

600

70%

LEVEL 2

195

23%

LEVEL 3

44

5%

LEVEL 4

14

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

647

67%

LEVEL 2

221

23%

LEVEL 3

75

8%

LEVEL 4

26

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,874
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,621

LEVEL 1

696

19%

LEVEL 2

1,051

29%

LEVEL 3

1,121

31%

LEVEL 4

753

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,225
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,955

LEVEL 1

723

18%

LEVEL 2

1,007

25%

LEVEL 3

1,235

31%

LEVEL 4

990

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,351
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,671

LEVEL 1

2,595

46%

LEVEL 2

1,725

30%

LEVEL 3

908

16%

LEVEL 4

443

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,813
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,202

LEVEL 1

2,711

44%

LEVEL 2

1,678

27%

LEVEL 3

1,239

20%

LEVEL 4

574

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.