Skip to Content
Main content

SAINT LAWRENCE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,897
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,806

LEVEL 1

1,804

31%

LEVEL 2

2,105

36%

LEVEL 3

1,301

22%

LEVEL 4

596

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,144
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,919

LEVEL 1

1,893

32%

LEVEL 2

1,882

32%

LEVEL 3

1,396

24%

LEVEL 4

748

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

919
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,818

LEVEL 1

825

29%

LEVEL 2

1,074

38%

LEVEL 3

623

22%

LEVEL 4

296

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

1,052
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,869

LEVEL 1

869

30%

LEVEL 2

948

33%

LEVEL 3

678

24%

LEVEL 4

374

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

978
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,988

LEVEL 1

979

33%

LEVEL 2

1,031

35%

LEVEL 3

678

23%

LEVEL 4

300

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

1,092
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,050

LEVEL 1

1,024

34%

LEVEL 2

934

31%

LEVEL 3

718

24%

LEVEL 4

374

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

27
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

58

50%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

15

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,794
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,483

LEVEL 1

1,710

31%

LEVEL 2

1,979

36%

LEVEL 3

1,232

22%

LEVEL 4

562

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2,021
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,570

LEVEL 1

1,778

32%

LEVEL 2

1,771

32%

LEVEL 3

1,309

24%

LEVEL 4

712

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

22

42%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

19

36%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

20

28%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

30

38%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

1,859
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,837

LEVEL 1

1,094

23%

LEVEL 2

1,884

39%

LEVEL 3

1,274

26%

LEVEL 4

585

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

2,089
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,941

LEVEL 1

1,150

23%

LEVEL 2

1,702

34%

LEVEL 3

1,351

27%

LEVEL 4

738

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 969

LEVEL 1

710

73%

LEVEL 2

221

23%

LEVEL 3

27

3%

LEVEL 4

11

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

55
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 978

LEVEL 1

743

76%

LEVEL 2

180

18%

LEVEL 3

45

5%

LEVEL 4

10

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,894
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,794

LEVEL 1

1,799

31%

LEVEL 2

2,101

36%

LEVEL 3

1,299

22%

LEVEL 4

595

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,141
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,899

LEVEL 1

1,881

32%

LEVEL 2

1,877

32%

LEVEL 3

1,393

24%

LEVEL 4

748

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,148
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,537

LEVEL 1

475

19%

LEVEL 2

914

36%

LEVEL 3

752

30%

LEVEL 4

396

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1,248
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,570

LEVEL 1

495

19%

LEVEL 2

827

32%

LEVEL 3

752

29%

LEVEL 4

496

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

749
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,269

LEVEL 1

1,329

41%

LEVEL 2

1,191

36%

LEVEL 3

549

17%

LEVEL 4

200

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

896
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,349

LEVEL 1

1,398

42%

LEVEL 2

1,055

32%

LEVEL 3

644

19%

LEVEL 4

252

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1,888
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,731

LEVEL 1

1,759

31%

LEVEL 2

2,084

36%

LEVEL 3

1,296

23%

LEVEL 4

592

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2,128
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,849

LEVEL 1

1,862

32%

LEVEL 2

1,859

32%

LEVEL 3

1,383

24%

LEVEL 4

745

13%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

45

60%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

31

44%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.