Skip to Content
Main content

RIDGEWAY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

64

21%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

93

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

101

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

50

31%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

53

37%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

10

91%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

8

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

33

54%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

59
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

40

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

50

28%

LEVEL 2

40

23%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

93

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

101

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

14

58%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

167
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

91

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

165
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

97

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

33

54%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

71

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

12%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

71

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

52

35%

LEVEL 2

41

28%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.