GREENBURGH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

294

41%

LEVEL 2

199

28%

LEVEL 3

129

18%

LEVEL 4

88

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

284

39%

LEVEL 2

187

26%

LEVEL 3

136

19%

LEVEL 4

113

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

148

40%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

141

38%

LEVEL 2

104

28%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

146

43%

LEVEL 2

77

23%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

143

41%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

15

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

24

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

29

30%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

28

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

139

50%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

134

48%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

118

42%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

92
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

115

40%

LEVEL 2

81

28%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

181

31%

LEVEL 2

173

29%

LEVEL 3

132

22%

LEVEL 4

107

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

103

81%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

214
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

258

39%

LEVEL 2

183

28%

LEVEL 3

126

19%

LEVEL 4

88

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

236
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

246

38%

LEVEL 2

172

26%

LEVEL 3

129

20%

LEVEL 4

107

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

36

65%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

65

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

205

45%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

77

17%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.