Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHEAST SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

26

14%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

75

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

100

51%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

37

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

35

34%

LEVEL 4

49

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

38

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

51

54%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

37

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

63
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

22

33%

LEVEL 4

41

61%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

25

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

44

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

73

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

96

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

122
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

72

45%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

88

51%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

11

52%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

12

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

57

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

10%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

73

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

24

36%

LEVEL 4

18

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

27

42%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.