Skip to Content
Main content

RIVERHEAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

165

57%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

42

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

231

64%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

64

53%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

94

67%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

101

59%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

137

62%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

23

28%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

27

73%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

24

63%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

113

68%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

164

69%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

121

50%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

177

59%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

44

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

54

90%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

126

51%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

89

89%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

105

91%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

58

47%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

107

64%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

198

71%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

225

64%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.