Skip to Content
Main content

LIME KILN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

224

48%

LEVEL 2

162

35%

LEVEL 3

58

12%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

265

58%

LEVEL 2

117

26%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

97

41%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

136

58%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

127

55%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

129

58%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

64

49%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

60

55%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

150

49%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

192

61%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

111

35%

LEVEL 2

129

41%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

156

49%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

113

73%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

109

81%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

89

33%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

97

39%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

135

67%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

168

82%

LEVEL 2

31

15%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

14

50%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

215

49%

LEVEL 2

156

35%

LEVEL 3

53

12%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

251

59%

LEVEL 2

112

26%

LEVEL 3

45

11%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.