ANNA S KUHL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

102

27%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

118

29%

LEVEL 2

107

26%

LEVEL 3

110

27%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

57

27%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

55

31%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

6

29%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

53

22%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

54

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

19

38%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

26

51%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

20

29%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

27

32%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

75

23%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

82

23%

LEVEL 2

100

28%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

36

69%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

145
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

184
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

113

28%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

43

34%

LEVEL 4

39

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

102

36%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.