Skip to Content
Main content

MEADOW HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

271

48%

LEVEL 2

163

29%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

245

42%

LEVEL 2

158

27%

LEVEL 3

120

21%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

115

45%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

156

51%

LEVEL 2

82

27%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

138

43%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

5

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

25

27%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

28

30%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

52

51%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

63

55%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

189

55%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

81
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

148

44%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

189

41%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

93

20%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

159

33%

LEVEL 2

146

31%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

56

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

82

80%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

86

81%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

124
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

178

41%

LEVEL 2

132

30%

LEVEL 3

89

21%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

169

36%

LEVEL 2

130

27%

LEVEL 3

117

25%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

93

72%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

76

71%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

47

36%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

224

52%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

209

48%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.