Skip to Content
Main content

MIDDLETOWN TWIN TOWERS MS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

259

45%

LEVEL 2

214

37%

LEVEL 3

84

14%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

248

42%

LEVEL 2

211

36%

LEVEL 3

101

17%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

115

39%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

144

50%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

9

50%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

26

37%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

25

46%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

75

48%

LEVEL 2

53

34%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

69

46%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

145

46%

LEVEL 2

126

40%

LEVEL 3

37

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

154

44%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

198

40%

LEVEL 2

195

39%

LEVEL 3

83

17%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

181

36%

LEVEL 2

199

39%

LEVEL 3

98

19%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

61

75%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

67

81%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

203

41%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

81

16%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

176

36%

LEVEL 2

191

39%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

56

67%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

72

75%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

34

30%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

30

28%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

232

50%

LEVEL 2

167

36%

LEVEL 3

50

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

218

45%

LEVEL 2

176

36%

LEVEL 3

72

15%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.