CANANDAIGUA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

240
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

192

37%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

93

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

179

31%

LEVEL 3

144

25%

LEVEL 4

154

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

46

16%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

84

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

70

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

70

15%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

138

30%

LEVEL 4

83

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

73

15%

LEVEL 2

143

29%

LEVEL 3

132

27%

LEVEL 4

139

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

141

32%

LEVEL 4

91

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

137

28%

LEVEL 4

153

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

52

66%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

52

59%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

186
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

112

32%

LEVEL 4

74

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

44

11%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

123

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

71

41%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.