TULLY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to the State’s new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

56

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

58

41%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

134
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

89

43%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

47

46%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.